Risk intelligence for school trips

The Travel Program Review

Tier 1 Organizational Readiness

The Travel Program Review looks at a school’s travel program as a whole: its own policies and procedures, program path by program path, and the documents of every provider it currently uses. ETI360 evaluates both against the ETI360 Operational Capability Framework and writes one report for the school’s leadership, once every four years.

What the school receives

The report opens with where the program stands across the ten areas of the ETI360 Operational Capability Framework, then sets out each area, each program path, and each provider. Every evidence line names the document, section, and page it comes from, and the report comes in US Letter and A4.

Harborview International School · Singapore

Travel Program Review, sample edition

A sample review for a fictional international school: its travel program read path by path, with every finding traced to the document, section, and page it comes from.

First page of the Travel Program Review

School leadership

Travel Program Review

A4US Letter

Travel Program Review, page 2
The summary: the international path read on its own and every program path together, then the state of each of the ten areas.
Travel Program Review, page 5
One area across the paths: Governance and Policy, the state of each program path, and each evidence line with the document, section, and page it comes from.
Travel Program Review, page 18
The documents read, each with its reference and issue date, and the documents referenced but not provided for review.

Harborview International School is a fictional school; its location is shown for illustrative purposes.

Providers. In a school’s report, a provider section follows: each provider the school uses, in turn, with what its documents cover in each area and the evidence behind each finding. The evaluation below is that section for one provider, shown on its own and naming no school. ETI360 shows what each provider’s documents cover; it does not certify, approve, rank, or recommend a provider. Decisions about each provider stay with the school.

Line & Landmark Cycle Travel · Loire Valley, France

Provider Evaluation, sample edition

A sample provider evaluation for a fictional cycling-tour provider: its three documents read against the ten areas of the ETI360 Operational Capability Framework, each area with its own state and each line cited to its document and section.

First page of the Provider Evaluation: Line & Landmark Cycle Travel

School leadership

Provider Evaluation: Line & Landmark Cycle Travel

A4US Letter

Provider Evaluation: Line & Landmark Cycle Travel, page 2
The summary: what a provider evaluation is, the state of each of the ten areas with the page that holds its evidence, and the three documents read, with the one that governs.
Provider Evaluation: Line & Landmark Cycle Travel, page 6
Partner Vetting: how the hotels, bike rental, coaches and guides a tour relies on are chosen or checked, which the governing document does not describe; the proposal’s and the catalog’s lines, shown but not counted; and the three open items.
Provider Evaluation: Line & Landmark Cycle Travel, page 11
Incident Response: the first response, the crash and missing-student steps and the emergency numbers, each quoted with its section and page, then the five open items, among them an incident reporting form not yet written.

Line & Landmark is a fictional trip provider created by ETI360 for demonstration purposes.

What the review covers

The school’s program paths

The review reads the school’s own travel policies and procedures one program path at a time, wherever the school runs them:

  • International multi-day trips
  • Elementary day trips
  • Athletics and activities travel
  • Week Without Walls
  • Service learning and CAS
  • Exchanges and homestays

Each path is read from its own documents, because each kind of trip usually has its own policy, handbook, or procedure. A path the school runs without a written procedure still appears in the report, so leadership sees the whole program.

The providers’ documents

The review also evaluates the documents of every provider the school currently uses, against the same framework: the policies, procedures, and supporting documents each provider shares with the school. For each provider, the report shows what its documents cover, area by area, in the same terms as the school’s own.

How it works

  1. The school emails ETI360 its travel policies and procedures, and the documents each of its providers has shared with it.
  2. ETI360 reads each document, evaluates it against the framework, and writes the report.
  3. The school’s leadership reads the report and decides what, if anything, to change.

The school sends what it has, by email.

Which standard is this against?

The ETI360 Operational Capability Framework was aligned on a number of international standards. It sits beside the school’s own policies, its accreditor’s standards, its insurer’s requirements, the rules of the country it operates in, and, for travel abroad, government travel advisories, without replacing them.

Who decides

The school and any provider it works with retain responsibility for decisions and approvals. ETI360 evaluates documents and shows what they cover; it never certifies, approves, ranks, or recommends a provider.

Who does the work

ETI360 was founded by Dan Skimin and Seb Wong. Dan Skimin, Principal Consultant, spent 16 years as an international school athletics director and trip coordinator, coordinating 600 programs for 12,000 students. Seb Wong, Senior Consultant, is part of every engagement.